The Psychotherapy Process Q-set from the Perspective of the Italian Research in Psychotherapy: Commentary on a Paper by J. Stuart Ablon, Raymond A. Levy, and Lotte Smith-Hansen

Vittorio Lingiardi, Laura Bonalume, Antonello Colli, Daniela Gentile, Annalisa Tanzilli
  • Laura Bonalume
    Affiliation not present
  • Antonello Colli
    Urbino University, Italy
  • Daniela Gentile
    University of Rome, "Sapienza", Italy
  • Annalisa Tanzilli
    Sapienza University, Italy

Abstract

In their review, Ablon, Levy, and Smith-Hansen (2011) showed that the Psychotherapy Process Q-set (PQS; Jones, 2000) has been applied to a large range of studies with different methods and aims, from Randomized Control Trials (RCT) to naturalistic studies and single-case designs. Focusing on our colleagues’ work, we will highlight the contribution of the PQS to research in psychotherapy, not only in process-outcome studies, but also into the therapeutic action debates, the specific vs common factors discussion, and the insight vs relation dialect. According to our studies, PQS has played the most relevant and innovative role in psychoanalysis. Ablon et al. (2011) showed how Jones left the clinical inheritance of his empirical method. One of PQS’s strengths deals with the Q-sort methodology (Stephenson, 1953; Block, 1961) that enables both an empirical study of human subjectivity (McKnown & Thomas, 1988) and the application of rigorous data analysis for single-case designs, such as the P-technique and time series analysis. PQS, as colleagues have shown, is useful in single-case designs that, despite their limitations in the generalization of the findings (Kazdin, 2002), capture the richness and complexity of the clinical dialogue and describe the uniqueness of the patient and therapist dyad and interaction structures.

Keywords

PQS, research on psychotherapy process

Full Text:

PDF
Submitted: 2011-10-24 20:54:20
Published: 2011-12-28 23:32:48
Search for citations in Google Scholar
Related articles: Google Scholar
Abstract views:
680

Views:
PDF
92

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


Copyright (c) 2011 Vittorio Lingiardi, Laura Bonalume, Antonello Colli, Daniela Gentile, Annalisa Tanzilli

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 
© PAGEPress 2008-2017     -     PAGEPress is a registered trademark property of PAGEPress srl, Italy.     -     VAT: IT02125780185