Balancing clinical risk with countertransference management protects alliance

  • Joào F. Barreto Center for Psychology at University of Porto; Faculty of Psychology and Education Science, University of Porto; Polytechnic Instituteof PortoPolytechnic Institute of Porto, Portugal, Portugal. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1893-4819
  • Paula Mena Matos | pmmatos@fpce.up.pt Center for Psychology at University of Porto; Faculty of Psychology and Education Science, University of Porto, Portugal.

Abstract

The working alliance has been recognized as a predictor of psychotherapy outcome across therapeutic orientations. Despite mixed findings regarding the effect of problem severity on the alliance formation, there is evidence suggesting that therapist factors may interfere in this association. This study examined how clients baseline clinical features affected the early alliance and the possible role of therapists countertransference management as a mediator. Thirteen therapeutic dyads were assessed at 2 different time points. Clients clinical dimensions were assessed prior to the 2nd session, and therapists countertransference management and clients ratings of the alliance were measured after the 2nd session. Positive associations were found between clients subjective wellbeing, social functioning, risk, and global psychological distress and countertransference management dimensions and total score. Empathy-based countertransference management suppressed the negative impact of clinical risk on alliance. Our findings suggest that clinical problems activate countertransference management, which in turn may buffer their negative effect on alliance.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2017-10-27
Info
Issue
Section
Articles
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 1117

  • PDF: 597
  • HTML: 416
How to Cite
Barreto, J. F., & Matos, P. M. (2017). Balancing clinical risk with countertransference management protects alliance. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2017.279