Dynamics of sense-making and development of the narrative in the clinical exchange

  • Alessandro Gennaro | alessandro.gennaro@unisalento.it
  • Miguel Goncalves Universidade do Minho, Portugal.
  • Inès Mendes Universidade do Minho, Portugal.
  • Antònio Ribeiro Universidade do Minho, Portugal.
  • Sergio Salvatore

Abstract

The present work is aimed at exploring the relationship between the dynamics of sense-making carried out by the clinical exchange and the content of the patient’s narrative. To this end the relationship between the formal and functional mapping of a psychotherapy carried out by the Discourse Flow Analysis (DFA) and the analysis of the patient’s narrative provided by the Innovative Moment Coding System (IMCS) have been compared. The comparison concerns a 15-session good outcome Emotion-Focused Therapy (Lisa's case). Findings highlight the association between the formal and functional characteristics of the clinical dialogue and the content of the narrative. More in particular, an association between the U-shape trajectory of the super-ordered meaning depicted by DFA and the evolution of the innovative content of the narrative enucleated by the IMCS were found.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-04-19
Section
Articles
Statistics
Abstract views: 393

PDF: 359
Share it

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

How to Cite
Gennaro, A., Goncalves, M., Mendes, I., Ribeiro, A., & Salvatore, S. (2011). Dynamics of sense-making and development of the narrative in the clinical exchange. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 14(1), 90–120. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2011.44

Most read articles by the same author(s)