Articles
25 August 2025
Online Advance Publication

Effectiveness of Jungian psychotherapy in supervised training settings

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Jungian psychotherapy (JP) is an established treatment modality in modern healthcare systems, yet empirical validation remains a key requirement for its continued recognition and insurance coverage. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of JP by evaluating pre- and post-treatment changes in psychological symptoms, personality structure, and quality of life among 104 participants undergoing supervised therapy at a German training institute. Using a pre-post design, participants completed standardized psychometric assessments, including the International Classification of Diseases – 10th Revision (ICD-10) Symptom Rating (ISR), the Fragebogen zur Lebenszufriedenheit (FLZ; Life Satisfaction Questionnaire), and the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis - Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ), before and after therapy. Results from paired samples t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests indicated significant improvements across multiple domains. Participants experienced notable reductions in symptom burden, particularly in depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large (d=0.555 to d=1.174). Improvements were also observed in self-perception, interpersonal contact, and relational experiences. However, eating disorder symptoms did not show significant improvement (p=.275), likely due to the need for specialized interventions. Future research should employ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and long-term follow-ups to establish the durability of treatment effects.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Banham, J. A., & Schweitzer, R. D. (2016). Trainee‐therapists are not all equal: Examination of therapeutic efficiency, effectiveness, and early client dropout after 12 months of clinical training. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 89(2), 148–162. doi: 10.1111/papt.12071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12071
Breyer, F., Heinzel, R., & Klein, T. (1997). Kosten und Nutzen ambulanter Psychoanalyse in Deutschland. Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement, 2(3), 59–73.
Daig, I., Spangenberg, L., Henrich, G., Herschbach, P., Kienast, T., & Brähler, E. (2011). Alters- und geschlechtspezifische Neunormierung der Fragen zur Lebenszufriedenheit (FLZM) für die Altersspanne von 14 bis 64 Jahre [Age- and gender-specific new normative data for the Questions on Life Satisfaction Questionnaire for 14–64-year-olds]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Forschung und Praxis, 40(3), 172–178. doi: 10.1026/1616-3443/a000099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000099
Davis, L. E., & Attia, E. (2019). Recent advances in therapies for eating disorders. F1000Research, 8, F1000 Faculty Rev-1693. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19847.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19847.1
Dinger, U., Schauenburg, H., Hörz, S., Rentrop, M., Komo-Lang, M., Klinkerfuß, M., Köhling, J., Grande, T., & Ehrenthal, J. C. (2014). Self-report and observer ratings of personality functioning: A study of the OPD system. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(2), 220–225. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.828065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.828065
Dührssen, A. (1962). Katamnestische Ergebnisse bei 1004 Patienten nach analytischer Psychotherapie. Zeitschrift für Psycho-Somatische Medizin, 8(2), 94–113. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23987705
Ehrenthal, J. C., Dinger, U., Schauenburg, H., Horsch, L., Dahlbender, R. W., & Gierk, B. (2015). Entwicklung einer Zwölf-Item-Version des OPD-Strukturfragebogens (OPD-SQK). Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 61(3), 262–274. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2015.61.3.262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2015.61.3.262
Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Wilk, D., & Kreutel, K. (1986). Multimodale Erfassung der Lebenszufriedenheit: Eine Untersuchung an Koronarkranken. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 36(11), 347–354.
Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Schumacher, J., & Brähler, E. (2000). Fragebogen zur Lebenszufriedenheit (FLZ): Handanweisung. Hogrefe.
Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (2011). Therapist competence, therapy quality, and therapist training. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(6–7), 373–378. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.03.005
Fischer, H. F., Schirmer, N., Tritt, K., Klapp, B. F., & Fliege, H. (2011). Retest-Reliabilität und Änderungssensitivität des ICD-10-Symptom-Rating (ISR) in verschiedenen Stichproben. PPmP – Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 61(3–4), 162–169. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1249683
Fischer, H. F., Tritt, K., Klapp, B. F., & Fliege, H. (2010). Faktorstruktur und psychometrische Eigenschaften des ICD-10–Symptom-Rating (ISR) an Stichproben psychosomatischer Patienten. PPmP – Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 60(8), 307–315. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214419
Goldbeck, L., Koffmane, K., Lecheler, J., Thiessen, K., & Fegert, J. M. (2007). Disease severity, mental health, and quality of life of children and adolescents with asthma. Pediatric Pulmonology, 42(1), 15–22. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20509
Henrich, G., & Herschbach, P. (2000). Questions on Life Satisfaction (FLZM): A short questionnaire for assessing subjective quality of life. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 150–159. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.16.3.150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.16.3.150
Hill, C. E., Spiegel, S. B., Hoffman, M. A., Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., & Gelso, C. J. (2017). Therapist expertise in psychotherapy revisited. The Counseling Psychologist, 45(1), 7–53. doi: 10.1177/0011000016641192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000016641192
Jung, C. G. (1959). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; 2nd ed., Vol. 9, Part 1). Princeton University Press (Original work published 1934–1954).
Jung, C. G. (1960a). A review of the complex theory. In R. F. C. Hull (Trans.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (Vol. 8, pp. 92–104). Princeton University Press (Original work published 1934).
Jung, C. G. (1960b). The structure and dynamics of the psyche (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; 2nd ed., Vol. 8). Princeton University Press (Original work published 1928–1953).
Jung, C. G. (1966). Two essays on analytical psychology (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.; 2nd ed., Vol. 7). Princeton University Press (Original work published 1912–1940).
Keller, W. (2018). Quality management and empirical research activities in Jungian psychotherapy in Germany. In C. Roesler (Ed.), Research in analytical psychology (pp. 187–202). Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315527178-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315527178-13
Keller, W., Westhoff, G., Dilg, R., & Rohner, R. (1998). The Berlin Jungian Study: On the effectiveness and efficacy of outpatient (Jungian) psychoanalysis and psychotherapy—A catamnestic study (BJS) [Research report]. Available from: https://iaap.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/keller_odr.pdf
Keller, W., Westhoff, G., Dilg, R., Rohner, R., & Studt, H. H. (2002). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness aspects of outpatient (Jungian) psychoanalysis and psychotherapy—A catamnestic study. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber & M. Target (Eds.), Longer-term psychoanalytic treatment: Perspectives for therapists and researchers. Whurr.
Keller, W., Westhoff, G., Dilg, R., Rohner, R., & Studt, H. H. (2015). Effectiveness and utilization of health insurance benefits in long-term analyses: Results of an empirical follow-up study on the effectiveness of Jungian analysis. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1639.0242
Mattanza, G., Jakobsen, T., & Hurt, J. (2006). Jungsche Psychotherapie ist effizient [Jungian psychotherapy is efficient]. In G. Mattanza, I. Meier, & M. Schegel (Eds.), Seele und Forschung [Soul and Research] (pp. 38–82). Karger.
Meier, I., & Roth, G. (2022). Depression: Verstehen und behandeln aus Sicht der analytischen Psychologie [Depression: Understanding and treating from the perspective of analytical psychology]. W. Kohlhammer GmbH. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17433/978-3-17-041473-0
Merchant, J. (2018). Research on training: Findings from the evaluation of the IAAP’s International Router training program. In C. Roesler (Ed.), Research in Analytical Psychology (pp. 203-224). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315527178-14
Messina, I., Gullo, S., Gelo, O. C. G., Giordano, C., & Salcuni, S. (2019). An overview of the Italian contribution to the international multisite SPRISTAD study on psychotherapy training. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process, and Outcome, 22(3), Article 418. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2019.418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.418
Orlinsky, D. E., Messina, I., Hartmann, A., Willutzki, U., Heinonen, E., Rønnestad, M. H., & Schröder, T. (2024). Ninety psychotherapy training programmes across the globe: Variations and commonalities in an international context. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 24(2), 558–571. doi: 10.1002/capr.12690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12690
Papadopoulos, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The handbook of Jungian psychology: Theory, practice and applications. Routledge.
Roesler, C. (2018). Research on the effectiveness of Jungian psychotherapy: State of the art. In C. Roesler (Ed.), Research in analytical psychology: Applications from scientific, historical, and (cross-)cultural research (pp. 173–186). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315527178-12
Roesler, C. (2019). Theoretical foundations of analytical psychology: Recent developments and controversies. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 64(5), 658–681. doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12540
Roesler, C. (2021a). Contemporary psychotherapy research, psychodynamic psychotherapy and Jungian analysis. Psychologia, 62(2), 94–105. doi: 10.2117/psysoc.2020-B008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2020-B008
Roesler, C. (2021b). The archetype concept of C. G. Jung: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge.
Roesler, C., & Reefschläger, G. I. (2022). Jungian psychotherapy, spirituality, and synchronicity: Theory, applications, and evidence base. Psychotherapy, 59(3), 339–350. doi: 10.1037/pst0000402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000402
Rubin, S. I., & Powers, N. (2005). Analyzing the San Francisco psychotherapy research project [Unpublished report].
Tritt, K., von Heymann, F., Zaudig, M., Zacharias, I., Söllner, W., & Loew, T. (2008). Development of the “ICD-10-Symptom-Rating” (ISR) questionnaire. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 54(4), 409–418. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2008.54.4.409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2008.54.4.409
Tritt, K., von Heymann, F., Zaudig, M., Söllner, W., Klapp, B., Loew, T., & Bühner, M. (2010). ICD-10-Symptom-Rating (ISR) – Kurzdarstellung der Normierung [Assessment manual]. Institut für Qualitätsentwicklung in der Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik. Available from: http://www.iqp-online.de/index.php?page=download
Tritt, K., von Heymann, F., Zaudig, M., Lynch, S., Probst, T., Söllner, W., & Bühner, M. (2013). The ICD-10-Symptom-Rating (ISR): Brief description. Institute for Quality Development in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.
Tschuschke, V., Crameri, A., Koehler, M., Berglar, J., Muthi, K., Staczan, P., Von Wyl, A., Schulthess, P., & Koemeda-Lutz, M. (2014). The role of therapists’ treatment adherence, professional experience, therapeutic alliance, and clients’ severity of psychological problems: Prediction of treatment outcome in eight different psychotherapy approaches. Preliminary results of a naturalistic study. Psychotherapy Research, 25(4), 427–445. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2014.896055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2014.896055
Valenstein-Mah, H., Greer, N., McKenzie, L., Hansen, L., Strom, T. Q., Wiltsey Stirman, S., & Kehle-Forbes, S. M. (2020). Effectiveness of training methods for delivery of evidence-based psychotherapies: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 15(1), Article 40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00998-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-00998-w
World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organization.
Zeeck, A., Jäger, B., & Hartmann, A. (2019). Reasons for non-response and recommendations for optimal outpatient treatment of bulimia nervosa: A survey on German expert therapists’ views. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 65(4), 384–400. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2019.65.4.384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2019.65.4.384
Christian Roesler, Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Applied Sciences Freiburg

Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Switzerland; C.G. Jung-Institut Stuttgart, Germany; International Network for Research and Development in Analytical Psychology (INFAP3), Germany.

Elisabeth Schörry-Volk, C.G. Jung-Institut Stuttgart

International Network for Research and Development in Analytical Psychology (INFAP3), Germany.

Anette Müller, C.G. Jung-Institut Stuttgart

International Network for Research and Development in Analytical Psychology (INFAP3), Germany.

How to Cite



Effectiveness of Jungian psychotherapy in supervised training settings. (2025). Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2025.869