Reviews
3 July 2025
Online Advance Publication
https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2025.861

Research in psychoanalysis across theory and practice: a systematic literature review

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Psychoanalysis, research, psychoanalysis and psychology research
80
Views
28
Downloads

Authors

Cristina Marogna
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
Ciro De Vincenzo
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-2536
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
Klodjana Lleshi
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
Elisa Paluan
elisa.paluan@phd.unipd.it
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4657-4743
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education, and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
Andrea Viecelli Giannotti
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-513X
Goldilocks Zone (Go-Zone) Association for Social and Health Climate Actions, Padua, Italy.

The present systematic review of the literature aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of the art of research in psychoanalysis. The arguments draw a difference between psychoanalytic research and research in psychoanalysis, meaning that in the past decades, there has been an attempt to bridge the gaps between psychoanalysis and broader research in psychology. Major scientific databases for contemporary psychological research (Ebsco PsycINFO, Ebsco CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PEP-Web) were searched to gather psychoanalytic-oriented research, both theoretical and empirical. The PRIMA method provided a total of 36 results, on which a conceptual/reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. The identified themes or dimensions are: i) the epistemological status of psychoanalysis; ii) the research domains in psychoanalysis; iii) the research methodology in psychoanalysis; iv) the research methods in psychoanalysis; and v) the instruments of research in psychoanalysis. We conclude that, despite long-lasting difficulties in the epistemological cohabitation between psychoanalysis and mainstream psychological research, new hybrid ways for future psychoanalysis can be identified.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Archard, P. J. (2020). Psychoanalytically informed research interviewing: notes on the free association narrative interview method. Nurse Researcher, 28(2), 42–49. doi: 10.7748/nr.2020.e1718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2020.e1718
Archard, P. J., & O’Reilly, M. (2023). Qualitative research interviewing: application and use of free association. Nurse Researcher, 31(2), 22–29. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2023.e1875
Archard, P. J., O’Reilly, M., & Sommantico, M. (2024). Free association and qualitative research interviewing: perspectives and applications. Qualitative Research Journal, 24(5), 643–654. doi: 10.1108/QRJ-10-2023-0149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-10-2023-0149
Bachrach, H. M. (2002). Foundations for Conceptual Research in Psychoanalysis: Anna Ursula Dreher. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 71(3), 607–608. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2002.tb00527.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2002.tb00527.x
Bernardi, R. (2015). What kind of discipline is psychoanalysis? The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96(3), 731–754. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12351
Bucci, W. (2007). Four domains of experience in the therapeutic discourse. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 27(5), 617–639. doi: 10.1080/07351690701468157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690701468157
Bryman, A. (2008), Of methods and methodology. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 3(2), pp. 159–168. doi: 10.1108/17465640810900568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640810900568
Campos, É. B. V. (2021). Research design in the psychoanalytic field: A synthetic proposition. Psicologia Clínica, 33(3), 487–505. doi: 10.33208/PC1980-5438v0033n03A05
Chiesa, M. (2010). Research and psychoanalysis: Still time to bridge the great divide? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27(2), 99–114. doi: 10.1037/a0019413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019413
Colton, D., & Covert, R. W. (2007). Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. John Wiley & Sons.
De Vincenzo, C., Stocco, N., & Modugno, R. (2024). A critical sociocultural understanding of evidence-based research and practice paradigm in contemporary psychology. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 58(1), 160–177. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09798-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09798-5
Dieronitou, I. (2014). The ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. International Journal of Economics, Commerce, and Management, 2(10). Retrieved from http://ijecm.co.uk/volume-ii-issue-10/
Eliezer, K., & Peled, E. (2023). Intertextual psychoanalytic-intersubjective analysis in qualitative research: ‘Can two walk together, except they be agreed?’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(4), 425–437. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2021.2011118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.2011118
Escalona, S. (1952). Problems in psycho-analytic research. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 33(1), 11–21.
Fonagy, P. (2003). Psychoanalysis today. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2(2), 73–80.
Fonagy, P. (2013). There is room for even more doublethink: The perilous status of psychoanalytic research. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23(1), 116–122. doi: 10.1080/10481885.2013.754276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2013.754276
Gottdiener, W. H., & Suh, J. J. (2012). Expanding the single-case study: A proposed psychoanalytic research program. Psychoanalytic Review, 99(1), 81–102. doi: 10.1521/prev.2012.99.1.81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2012.99.1.81
Hinshelwood, R. D. (2010). Psychoanalytic research: Is clinical material any use? Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 24(4), 362–379. doi: 10.1080/02668734.2010.513541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02668734.2010.513541
Holmes, J. (2016). Reverie‐informed research interviewing. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 98(3), 709–728. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12581
Huprich, S. K., & Bornstein, R. F. (2015). Behind closed doors: Sadomasochistic enactments and psychoanalytic research. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35(Supp1), 185–195. doi: 10.1080/07351690.2015.987604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2015.987604
Kächele, H., Schachter, J., & Thomä, H. (2011). From psychoanalytic narrative to empirical single case research: Implications for psychoanalytic practice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891865
Kaluzeviciute, G., & Willemsen, J. (2020). Scientific thinking styles: The different ways of thinking in psychoanalytic case studies. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 101(5), 900–922. doi: 10.1080/00207578.2020.1796491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2020.1796491
Kernberg, O. F. (2004). Rewards, dangers, findings, and attitudes in psychoanalytic research. Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 12(2), 178–194.
Kernberg, O. F. (2006). Psychoanalytic controversies: The pressing need to increase research in and on psychoanalysis. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(4), 919–936. doi: 10.1516/46N7-ULAM-DQKR-VGRT DOI: https://doi.org/10.1516/46N7-ULAM-DQKR-VGRT
Kernberg, O. F. (2015). Resistances and progress in developing a research framework in psychoanalytic institutes. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35(Supp1), 98–114. doi: 10.1080/07351690.2015.987596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2015.987596
Kessler, C. H., & Lopes, F. F. (2023). Methodology in psychoanalytic research: From transference flows to lineages of affiliation. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 33, e3329. doi: 10.1590/1982-4327e3329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3329
Kvale, S. (1999). The psychoanalytic interview as qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 87–113. doi: 10.1177/107780049900500105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049900500105
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2015). Development of a plurality during the one hundred year old history of research of psychoanalysis. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber and H. Kächele (Eds.), An Open Door Review of Outcome and Process Studies in Psychoanalysis (3rd ed., pp. 18–32). London: International Psychoanalytic Association.
Leuzinger‐Bohleber, M., & Fischmann, T. (2006). What is conceptual research in psychoanalysis? 1: Research Subcommittee for Conceptual Research of the International Psychoanalytical Association 3. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(5), 1355–1386. doi: 10.1516/73MU-E53N-D1EE-1Q8L DOI: https://doi.org/10.1516/73MU-E53N-D1EE-1Q8L
Lingiardi, V., Gazzillo, F., & Waldron Jr, S. (2010). An empirically supported psychoanalysis: The case of Giovanna. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27(2), 190–218. doi: doi/10.1037/a0019418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019418
Luyten, P., Blatt, S. J., & Corveleyn, J. (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54(2), 571–610. doi: 10.1177/00030651060540021301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651060540021301
Mastnak, W. (2021). Psychoanalysis and Qualitative Factor Analysis: A comparative meta-theoretical perspective. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11022.89922
McAloon, R. F. (1992). A historical survey of psychoanalytic research. Modern Psychoanalysis, 17(2), 161–182.
McGregor-Hepburn, J., & James, D. (2021). Qualitative sociological research methodologies and psychoanalytic thinking-congruence, “discongruence” and lacunae. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 20(2), 206–214. doi: 10.1080/15289168.2021.1918315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15289168.2021.1918315
Midgley, N. (2006). The ‘inseparable bond between cure and research’: Clinical case study as a method of psychoanalytic inquiry. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 32(2), 122–147. doi: 10.1080/00754170600780273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00754170600780273
Midgley, N. (2014). Psychoanalysis and qualitative psychology: Complementary or contradictory paradigms? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(3), 213–231. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qrp065oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qrp065oa
Navridi, A., & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2018). Research and psychoanalysis: A controversial and complex relationship, Psychiatriki, 29(4), 359–366. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2018.294.359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2018.294.359
Nobus, D., & Quinn, M. (2005). Knowing nothing, staying stupid: Elements for a psychoanalytic epistemology (1st ed.). Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203970256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970256
Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2015). Research methodology: Tools and techniques. Bridge Center.
Quinn, B. P. (1992). Communicative psychoanalysis: Contributions to clinical practice and the development of a science of psychoanalysis. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 22(4), 235–246. doi: 10.1007/BF00946208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00946208
Person, E. S., Cooper, A. M., & Gabbard, G. O. (Eds.). (2005). The American psychiatric publishing textbook of psychoanalysis. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc..
Rabinovich, M. (2020). Elephant in the room: A methodology for case studies metasynthesis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 68(6), 1023–1050. doi: 10.1177/0003065120979613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065120979613
Rapaport, D. (1960). The structure of psychoanalytic theory. Psychological Issues, 2(2), 1–158.
Roustang, F. (1984). On the epistemology of Psychoanalysis. MLN, 99(4), 928–940. doi: 10.2307/2905509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2905509
Sandell, R. (2014). On the value of double vision. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 50(1-2), 43–57. doi: 10.1080/00107530.2014.880300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2014.880300
Shulman, D. G. (1990). The investigation of psychoanalytic theory by means of the experimental method. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71(3), 487–497.
Stangalino, M. (2023). Mauro Mancia e la sfida epistemologica in psicoanalisi: Tra la dimensione onirica della cura e il campo di ricerca delle neuroscienze [Mauro Mancia and the epistemological challenge in psychoanalysis: Between the dream dimension of treatment and the field of neuroscience research]. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 69(3), 941–955. doi: 10.26364/RPSA20230690941
Tillman, J. G., Clemence, A. J., & Stevens, J. L. (2011). Mixed methods research design for pragmatic psychoanalytic studies. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59(5), 1023–1040. doi: 10.1177/0003065111418650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065111418650
Varvin, S. (2011). Phenomena or research data? Qualitative and quantitative strategies in psychoanalysis. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 34(2), 117–123. doi: 10.1080/01062301.2011.10592894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01062301.2011.10592894
Wallerstein, R. (1986). Psychoanalysis as a science: A response to the new challenges. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 55(3), 414–451. doi: 10.1080/21674086.1986.11927148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1986.11927148
Wallerstein, R. S. (1988). Psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic science, and psychoanalytic research-1986. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 36(1), 3–30. doi: 10.1177/000306518803600101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000306518803600101
Wallerstein, R. S. (2006). The relevance of Freud's psychoanalysis in the 21st century: Its science and its research. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 302–326. doi: 10.1037/0736-9735.23.2.302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.23.2.302
Wallerstein, R. S. (2009). What kind of research in psychoanalytic science? The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90(1), 109–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00107.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00107.x
Zhang, W., & Xie, W. (2023). New century landscape of psychoanalysis: A visual analysis based on CiteSpace. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 40(4), 296–308. doi: 10.1037/pap0000466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000466

How to Cite



Research in psychoanalysis across theory and practice: a systematic literature review. (2025). Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2025.861
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.