Going through the lockdown: a longitudinal study on the psychological consequences of the coronavirus pandemic
Accepted: November 27, 2020
SUPPLEMENTARY: 100
HTML: 24
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Coronavirus 2019 pandemic lockdown in Italy lasted for 2 months, 1 week and 2 days. During this long period, one of the longest in Europe, the restrictions produced effects on people’s psychological well-being, with consequences that also continued after lockdown. The purpose of the study is to investigate these effects and how they changed in the general population over a period of time. We are also interested in exploring people’s post-lockdown anxiety and concerns. We conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The longitudinal study consisted of four administrations covering a period of 10 weeks between April (baseline) and June (last follow-up). Levels of anxiety and depression were assessed by GAD-7 and PHQ-9, coping strategies were assessed by Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) and social support was assessed by MSPSS. Post-lockdown anxiety was explored by developing a set of ad-hoc questions. PCA was used to determine the principal categories of post-lockdown anxiety/concern resulting from the ad-hoc questions. Longitudinal data, given their nested structure, were analyzed through mixed modeling. Of the 411 responders at baseline, 169 had at least 3 out of 4 data points; the analysis was therefore conducted on this sample. Levels of depression and anxiety were found to be significantly higher in the study sample in comparison with normative samples for each of the fourtime points; levels of coping showed that scores from the study sample were significantly lower than normative data at all-time points. Levels of perceived social support were significantly lower than normative data at the baseline and the first follow-up. The results of the study suggest that the lockdown experience had enduring consequences on the mental health of individuals. Prevention and support interventions to limit the psychological distress caused by COVID-19 should be taken into consideration in countries experiencing a second wave of the pandemic.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Elena Ierardi, Marta Bottini, Emanuele Preti, Rossella Di Pierro, Fabio Madeddu, Cristina Riva Crugnola, Attachment styles, mental health, and trauma during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in an Italian adult population , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 26 No. 3 (2023)
- Felix Brauner, Peter Fonagy, Chloe Campbell, Julia Griem, Timo Storck, Tobias Nolte, “Trust me, do not trust anyone”: how epistemic mistrust and credulity are associated with conspiracy mentality , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 26 No. 3 (2023)
- Vera Békés, Claire J. Starrs, J. Christopher Perry, Tracy A. Prout, Ciro Conversano, Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe, Defense mechanisms are associated with mental health symptoms across six countries , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 26 No. 3 (2023)
- Emanuela Brusadelli, Christian Schubert, Silvia Salcuni, Facing the coronavirus pandemic era , Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2020)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
-
Iván Echeverria, Lorena Roselló-Jiménez, Ana Benito, Luz Angela Rojas-Bernal, Marcelo O’Higgins, Gonzalo HaroFrontiers in Public Health : 2023
-
Eric Murillo-RodríguezJocelyne Alcaraz-Silva, Daniel Feingold, Gerardo Viana-Torre, Henning Budde, Claudio Imperatori, Sérgio Machado,CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets : 2023
-
Daniel Ventus, Patrik SöderbergAssessment : 2024
-
Manuel Faggiano, Silvia Donato, Miriam Parise, Ariela Francesca Pagani, Laura Ferrari, Sonia Ranieri, Elena Canzi, Francesca Vittoria Danioni, Daniela Barni, Margherita Lanz, Camillo Regalia, Rosa Regina Rosnati, Raffaella IafrateJournal of Community & Applied Social Psychology : 2024
-
Brigitte Lueger-Schuster, Irina Zrnić Novaković, Annett LotzinInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health : 2022
-
Eric Murillo-RodríguezSleep and Vigilance : 2021
-
Yu. P. Zinchenko, O. O. Salagay, L. A. Shaigerova, O. V. Almazova, A. G. Dolgikh, O. V. VakhantsevaPublic Health : 2021
-
María Victoria Fasano, Marcela Padula, María Ángeles Azrak, Ana Julia Avico, Marisa Sala, María F. AndreoliFrontiers in Pediatrics : 2021
-
Angelo Rega, Raffaele Nappo, Roberta Simeoli, Mariangela CerasuoloInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health : 2022
-
Cecilia Giordano, Ivan Ambrosiano , Maria Teresa Graffeo, Alessandro Di Caro, Salvatore GulloResearch in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome : 2022
-
Yaru Wang, Qijun He, Xigen LiHealth Communication : 2024
-
Licia Lea Reatto, Andrzej Werbart, Osmano Oasi, Francesca De Salve, Elena Ierardi, Mattia Giordano, Cristina Riva CrugnolaFrontiers in Psychology : 2023
-
Massimiliano Sommantico, Ilaria Iorio, Marina Lacatena, Santa ParrelloResearch in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome : 2021
-
Chiara Rossi, Francesca De Salve, Martina Agliati, Osmano OasiResearch in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome : 2022