Articles
24 March 2023
Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023)
Developing a prototype for relationship therapy psychoanalysis: an empirical study with the Psychotherapy Process Q-set
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
2019
Views
596
Downloads
20
HTML
Authors
Psychotherapy Process Q-set (PQS) prototype characteristic of psychoanalytic relationship therapy does not yet exist. Experts in psychoanalysis of relationship therapy [from the Italian Society of Psychoanalysis of the Relationship (SIPRe)] used the 100-Item PQS questionnaire to rate an ideal SIPRe therapy. Agreement between rates was high (Cronbach’s alpha=0.84). The prototype for SIPRe therapy showed a significant correlation to the psychoanalytic prototype (r=0.68, p<0.000) and to the short expressive-supportive therapy (r=0.69, p<0.000) prototype. Correlations with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (r=0.28, p<0.005) and Interpersonal Therapy (r=0.22, p<0.031), prototypes were significant, but weaker. The correlation between the two SIPRe samples (junior and expert therapists) was highly significant (Spearman’s rho=0.936; p<000).
Altmetrics
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
Ablon, J. S., & Jones, E. E. (1998). How expert clinicians' prototypes of an ideal treatment correlate with outcome in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavior therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 8(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptr/8.1.71.
Ablon J.S., & Jones E.E. (2002). Validity of controlled clinical trials of psychotherapy: findings from the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159 (5), 775-783. http://doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.5.775. PMID: 11986131.
Ablon, J. S., Levy, R. A. & Katzenstein, T. (2006). Beyond brand names of psychotherapy: Identifying empirically supported change processes. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.43.2.216.
Benjamin. (2017). Beyond Doer and Done to: Recognition Theory, Intersubjectivity and the Third. LONDON: Routhledge.
Bonalume, L. (2019). Atteggiamenti terapeutici, risposte emotive e ruolo della supervisione negli psicoterapeuti in formazione. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 1, 91-112. https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2019.102.
Block, J. (1961). The Q-Sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. https://doi.org/10.1037/13141-000.
Brown, S.R. (1996). Q Methodology and Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 561-567. https://doi10.1177/104973239600600408.
Castonguay, L. G., Youn, S. J., Xiao, H., Muran, J. C. & Barber, J. P. (2015). Building cliniciansresearchers partnerships: Lessons from diverse natural settings and practice-oriented initiatives. Psychotherapy Research, 25(1), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2014.973923.
Ceruti, M. (1985). Le sfide della complessità. Milano, Feltrinelli.
Corbelli, L. (2020). Salutare Lia. Partire dai concetti di transfert e controtransfert per riflettere su una lettura interattiva tra i due sistemi paziente e analista. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2020.258.
Davidson, K. & MacGregor, M. W. (1996). Reliability of an idiographic Q-sort measure of defense mechanisms. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(3), 624–639. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_10.
Dazzi, N., Lingiardi, V. Colli, A., (Eds) (2006). La ricerca in psicoterapia. Modelli e Strumenti. Milano, Raffaello Cortina Editore. ISBN 97888603000560.
De Robertis (2009). Riflessioni sul processo della conoscenza: che cosa la psicoanalisi può offrire alla ricerca e la ricerca alla psicoanalisi? Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 3, 423-440. https://www.sipreonline.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/RP-2009-3_6-Gruppo-di-Ricerca-SIPRe_Riflessioni-sul-processo-della-conoscenza.pdf.
Fonagy, P. (2005). In Praise of Simplicity: Commentary on Ablon and Jones. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 53(2), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651050530020801.
Fonagy, P. (2002). An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis (2nd ed.). New York: International Psychoanalytic Association.
Goodman, G., Anderson, K. & Diener, M. J. (2014). Processes of therapeutic change in psychodynamic therapy of two inpatients with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 24(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035970.
Hauser, S. (2005). The legacy of Enrico Jones. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 53(2), 535-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651050530021201.
Jones, E. E. (1985). Manual for the psychotherapy process Q-set. Compton, A. (2002). Book Reviews: therapeutic action: a guide to psychoanalytic therapy. By Enrico E. Jones. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, 2000. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association,
(2), 671–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651020500022104.
Jones, E. E. & Ablon, J. S. (2005). On Analytic Process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 53(2), 541–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651050530020101.
Jones, E. E., Cumming, J. D. & Horowitz, M. J. (1988). Another look at the nonspecific hypothesis of therapeutic effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.1.48.
Jones, E.E. & Pulos, S.M. (1993). Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(2):306-16. doi: 10.1037//0022- 006x.61.2.306. PMID: 8473585.
Kernberg, O. (2014). Innovation in psychoanalytic education. New Associations (British Psychoanalytic Council Newsletter), 16, 10-11.
Kernberg, O.F. Psicoanalisi e formazione. Milano, Franco Angeli. Livia Tabanelli (Ed). Milano: Franco Angeli, 2018 (Original work)
Kernberg, O.F. (2016). Psychoanalytic Education at the Crossroad. Reformation, Change and the Future of Psychoanalytic Training. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315681405).
Leichsenring, F., Ablon, S., Barber, J.P., Beutel, M., Gibbons, M.B., Crits-Christoph, P., Klein, S., Leweke, F., Steinert, C., Wiltink, J. & Salzer, S. (2016). Developing a prototype for shortterm psychodynamic (supportive-expressive) therapy: An empirical study with the psychotherapy process Q-set. Psychotherapy Research, 26(4):500-10. http://doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1051160.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. & Bürgin, D. (2003). Pluralism and unity in psychoanalytic research: Some introductory remarks. In Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Dreher, A.U., & Canestri, J. (Eds.) (2003). Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis (pp. 1–26). London: International Psychoanalytical Association. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429478383.
McKeown, B. & Thomas, D. (1988). Q-methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Pub. McWilliams, N. (2013). Psychoanalysis and research: Some reflections and opinions. Psychoanalytic Review, 100(6), 919–945. https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2013.100.6.919.
McWilliams, N. (2013). Psychoanalysis and research: Some reflections and opinions. Psychoanalytic Review, 100(6), 919–945. https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2013.100.6.919.
Mitchell, S.A. (1993). Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. Basic Books, New York. https://archive.org/search.phpquery=externalidentifier%3A%22urn%3Aoclc%3Arecord%3A948368407%22.
Minolli, M. (2021). New Frontiers of Relational Thinking in Psychoanalysis. Routledge.(Original Works: Minolli, M. (2015). Essere e divenire. La sofferenza dell’individualismo. Milano: Franco Angeli.) https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146896.
Minolli, M. (2021a). Lo specifico del metodo psicoanalitico. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2020.504. https://pagepress.org/socialsciences/rp/article/view/504/449.
Minolli, M. (2020). Cinquant’anni dopo: fondare la psicoterapia psicoanalitica. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2020.270. https://pagepress.org/socialsciences/rp/article/view/270/219
Minolli, M. & Tricoli, M.L. (2004). Solving the Problems of Duality: the Third and Self-Consciousness. The Psychoanalitic Quarterly. 73(1), 137-166.
Norcross, J.C., Krebs, P.M., Prochaska, J.O. (2011). Stages of change. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(2):143-54. http://doi: 10.1002/jclp.20758. PMID: 21157930.
Pole, N., Ablon, J.S., O'Connor, L.E. & Weiss, J. (2002). Ideal control mastery technique correlates with change in a single case. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 39, 88-96. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-3204.39.1.88.
Rapaport, D. (1960). Die Struktur der psychoanalytischen Theorie. Stuttgard: Klett, 1961. (Tr. It. Struttura della teoria psicoanalitica. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri).
Ponsi, M. (2006). Il cammino della psicoanalisi verso il metodo scientifico: tradimento o traguardo? In: Dazzi, N., Lingiardi, V. & Colli, A. (Eds). La ricerca in psicoterapia (pp.715-740). Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore. ISBN 9788860300560.
Richards, A. D. (2003). Psychoanalytic discourse at the turn of our century: A plea for a measure of humility. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51(Suppl), 73–89.
Safran, J.D., Abreu, I., Ogilvie, J. & DeMaria, A. (2011), Does Psychotherapy Research Influence the Clinical Practice of Researcher–Clinicians? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18(4): 357-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2011.01267.x.
Scano, G.P. (2021). Un (Io-) soggetto consistente. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 31(3), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2020.322.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tasca, G.A., Sylvestre, J., Balfour, L., Chyurlia, L., Evans, J., Fortin-Langelier, B., Francis, K., Gandhi, J., Huehn, L., Hunsley, J., Joyce, A.S., Kinley, J., Koszycki, D., Leszcz, M., Lybanon- Daigle, V., Mercer, D., Ogrodniczuk, J.S., Presniak, M., Ravitz, P., Ritchie, K., Talbot, J., & Wilson B. (2015). What clinicians want: findings from a psychotherapy practice research network survey. Psychotherapy, 52(1), 1-11. http://doi: 10.1037/a0038252. Epub 2014 Dec 22. PMID: 25528356.
Tricoli, M. (2009). Mettersi in gioco con il paziente. L’analisi della relazione come Metodo. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 20 (2), 191-198.
Tricoli, M. L. (2021). Cinquant’anni di riflessione e ricerca - In ricordo di Michele Minolli. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 31(3), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2020.308.
Westen, D., Novotny, C.M., Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin Journal 130(4), 631-63. http://doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.631.
How to Cite
Developing a prototype for relationship therapy psychoanalysis: an empirical study with the Psychotherapy Process Q-set. (2023). Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2023.674
Copyright (c) 2023 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.