https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2023.706

The relationship between epistemic stance, mentalizing, paranoid distress and conspiracy mentality: an empirical investigation

Vol. 26 No. 3 (2023)
Submitted: July 7, 2023
Accepted: November 4, 2023
Published: December 28, 2023
Epistemic stance, mentalizing, paranoid distress, conspiracy mentality, structural equation modeling
Abstract Views: 775
PDF: 229
HTML: 38
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Sophie Hauschild
sophie.hauschild@med.uni-heidelberg.de
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-6995
Institute for Psychosocial Prevention, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
Lea A. Kasper
Institute for Psychosocial Prevention, University Hospital Heidelberg; Psychological Institute, University Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna Berning
Institute for Psychosocial Prevention, University Hospital Heidelberg; Psychological Institute, University Heidelberg, Germany.
Svenja Taubner
Institute for Psychosocial Prevention, University Hospital Heidelberg; Psychological Institute, University Heidelberg, Germany.

Epistemic stance, comprising epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity, and the closely related construct of mentalizing have been related to paranoid ideation and conspiracy mentality. All phenomena are common in the general population and may become clinically and societally relevant at an extreme expression by influencing an individual’s positioning towards socially transmitted information possibly as far as complete social detachment or attachment to extremist views. Herein, an individual’s experienced distress may play an important role, which has however largely been neglected in empirical research. Thus, this study aims to empirically investigate the effect of epistemic stance on a clinically relevant aspect of paranoid ideation, namely paranoid distress. We assume that epistemic stance will be associated with paranoid distress, but that this association will be mediated by mentalizing. Moreover, we assume that epistemic stance will be indirectly associated with conspiracy thinking via paranoid distress. Data of 595 participants (mean age = 43.05; SD = 13.87; female = 48.32%, male = 51.18%, diverse = 0.51%) were collected via self-report questionnaires through an online-based cross-sectional study. Structural equation modeling was performed for data analysis. As expected, epistemic mistrust was associated with paranoid distress via mentalizing deficits. Unexpectedly, epistemic trust was associated with more paranoid distress. Indirectly, epistemic trust was associated with conspiracy mentality via paranoid distress. Findings partially confirmed the hypothesized associations. Mentalizing may be a target for reducing distress associated with a distrusting epistemic stance. Epistemically trusting individuals with high paranoid distress may turn to conspiracy theories for regulation.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Awang, Z. (2012). A Handbook on Structural Equation Modelling Using AMOS Graphic (5th ed.). Universiti Teknologi Mara Kelantan.
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2010). Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 11-15. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00255.x
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
Campbell, C., Tanzer, M., Saunders, R., Booker, T., Allison, E., Li, E., O’Dowda, C., Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2021). Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust. PloS One, 16(4), e0250264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250264
Collins, L.M., Schafer, J.L., & Kam, C.M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological methods, 6(4), 330. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330
Fonagy, P., & Allison, E. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 372. doi: 10.1037/a0036505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036505
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of Self. Other Press. doi: 10.4324/9780429471643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429471643
Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Allison, E., & Campbell, C. (2019). Mentalizing, epistemic trust and the phenomenology of psychotherapy. Research Article Psychopathology, 52, 94-103. doi: 10.1159/000501526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000501526
Fonagy, P., Nolte, T., et al. (2023). Epistemisches Vertrauen als ntwicklungspsychologisches Konzept. In: T. Nolte & P. Fonagy (Eds.), Epistemisches Vertrauen (pp. 34–60). Klett-Cotta Verlag.
Freeman, D. (2007). Suspicious minds: the psychology of persecutory delusions. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(4), 425-457. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.10.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.10.004
Freeman, D., Garety, P. A., Bebbington, P. E., Smith, B., Rollinson, R., Fowler, D., Kuipers, E., Ray, K., & Dunn, G. (2005). Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a non-clinical population. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186(5), 427-435. doi:10.1192/bjp.186.5.427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.186.5.427
Hart, J., & Graether, M. (2018). Something’s going on here. Journal of Individual Differences. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000268
Hausberg, M. C., Schulz, H., Piegler, T., Happach, C. G., Klöpper, M., Brütt, A. L., Sammet, I., & Andreas, S. (2012). Is a self-rated instrument appropriate to assess mentalization in patients with mental disorders? Development and first validation of the Mentalization Questionnaire (MZQ). Psychotherapy Research, 22(6), 699-709. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.709325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.709325
Leiner, D. (n.d.). SoSci Survey (3.1.06). Available from: https://www.soscisurvey.de/
Lincoln, T. M. (2017). PCL. Paranoia Checklist - deutsche Fassung [Verfahrensdokumentation und Fragebogen]. In Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie (ZPID) (Ed.), Open Test Archive. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4650.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological methods, 17(3), 437. doi: 10.1037/a0028085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085
Molenda, Z., Green, R., Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Douglas, K.M. (2023). Emotion dysregulation and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 204, 112042. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.112042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.112042
Nolte, T., & Fonagy, P. (2023). Einleitung. In T. Nolte & P. Fonagy (Eds.), Epistemisches Vertrauen (pp. 23-33). Klett-Cotta Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783835397545-9
Pierre, J. M. (2020). Mistrust and Misinformation: A Two-Component, Socio-Epistemic Model of Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2) SE-Theoretical Articles), 617-641. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362
R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R. F. for S. Computing (ed.)). Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
Saris, W.E., Satorra, A., & Sörbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 105-129. doi: 10.2307/271030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/271030
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. doi: 0.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Taubner, S (2023, June 24th). Insights and challenges in assessing epistemic trust [Panel Discussion]. 54th International Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Dublin, Ireland.

How to Cite

Hauschild, S., Kasper, L. A., Berning, A., & Taubner, S. (2023). The relationship between epistemic stance, mentalizing, paranoid distress and conspiracy mentality: an empirical investigation. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2023.706
Copyright (c) 2023 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.