Repairing alliance ruptures in psychotherapy with adults: a scoping review
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Therapeutic alliance ruptures represent critical moments that, if properly addressed, may become opportunities for therapeutic change. Although various models and evidence exist regarding rupture repair, no prior scoping review has systematically mapped clinical recommendations using a replicable methodology. This review aimed to map clinical recommendations for repairing therapeutic alliance ruptures in psychotherapy with adults, focusing on therapist competencies, patient characteristics, and theoretical frameworks underpinning these recommendations. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, articles were retrieved from Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus, supplemented by secondary searches. Conceptual and empirical publications addressing rupture repair in individual psychotherapy with adults were included (n=25). The review maps two complementary sets of recommendations. Empirical studies appear to converge on strategies organized around rupture recognition, expressive repair (focused on exploring the rupture experience), and immediate repair (focused on corrective task and goal adjustments). Theoretical and conceptual contributions highlight the influence of cultural, contextual, and trauma-related factors on rupture and repair processes, emphasizing the need for sensitivity to patient-specific, cultural, and contextual factors. Overall, the findings suggest that the literature on rupture repair is evolving toward greater contextual sensitivity, with personalization and responsiveness emerging from an integrative reading of the findings as central challenges for clinical practice and future research.
Supporting Agencies
This work was funded by the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID)/Scholarship Program/Doctorado Nacional/2022-21220790 and 2023-21232300 and the Foundation for Research on Depression and Personality-MIDAP.Foundation for Research on Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago; Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago; PsiConecta Mental Health NGO, Santiago, Chile.
Foundation for Research on Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile; Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Foundation for Research on Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago; PsiConecta Mental Health NGO, Santiago, Chile.
Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.