Sandor Ferenczi’s concept of the dialogue of unconsciouses: a clinical example

Submitted: August 1, 2022
Accepted: April 17, 2023
Published: May 2, 2023
Abstract Views: 830
PDF: 158
HTML: 33
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

There is no doubt that Sandor Ferenczi is one of the principal giants in the early development of psychoanalysis. While much of his work has not been given the credit it deserves, in recent times there has been a revival of his concepts and way of doing analysis as a route to understanding relational work today. One of Sandor Ferenczi’s unique psychoanalytical concepts is the dialogue of unconsciouses. This concept is defined as the process when patient and analyst connect to each other, and a psychic process begins to form between the two unconsciouses. This idea of a dialogue between the two unconsciouses arose from his novel experiments with mutual analysis and advocating for a new kind of relationship. He further described the dialogue of the unconsciouses as a way of being with the patient and that if this dialogue is investigated within the therapy, in service of understanding the patient’s life experiences and transference, the potential for change and transformation is possible. In this context, Ferenczi assumed that if careful and focused attention is paid to the dialogue of the unconsciouses, it could reveal for the patient unknown aspects about himself but also unknown aspects about his analyst. In this way, the patient may know more about the analyst than the analyst knows. The clinical implication is that the dialogue of the unconsciouses invites both participants to authentically engage with each other in a way that something new about self-other could potentially arise that was previously unconscious but emerged from within the interplay of both unconsciouses. While not much has been developed in recent years on the topic of the dialogue of the unconsciouses, especially with the use of clinical examples, this paper’s main contribution is to i) acknowledge the work of Ferenczi by revisiting this concept, ii) discussing the clinical implications of the concept so that the potential for the client’s personal development is brought into focus, as well as iii) presenting a clinical example to illustrate the concept because such examples are few.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Aron, L., & Harris, H. (1993). The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi. Analytic Press.
Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds. The Analytic Press.
Bass, A. (2015). The dialogue of unconsciouses, mutual analysis and the uses of the self in contemporary relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 25, 2–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2015.991235
Blum, H. P. (2016). Interpretation and contemporary reinterpretation. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 36, 40-51. doi:10.1080/07351690.2016.1112220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2016.1112220
Benjamin, J. (2018). Beyond doer and done to: Recognition theory, intersubjectivity and the third. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315437699
Dupont, J. (1988). The clinical diary of Sandor Ferenczi. Harvard University Press.
Ferenczi, S. (1915). Psychogenic anomalies of voice production. In S. Ferenczi (Ed.), Further contributions to the theory and technique of psychoanalysis (pp. 105–109). Bruner Mazel. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429475245-8
Freud, S. (1893). Studies on Hysteria. Standard Edition. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol 2). Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1912). The dynamics of transference. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), Standard
edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol 12, pp. 99-100). Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1925). An autobiographical study. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 20, pp. 3–74). Hogarth Press.
Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041158
Mitchell, S. A. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Analytic Press.
Ogden, T. (1994b). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3-19.
Ogden, T. (1995). Analyzing forms of aliveness and deadness of the trans ference-countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 695-709.
Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 62, 553-571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1993.11927393

How to Cite

Knight, Z. G. (2023). Sandor Ferenczi’s concept of the dialogue of unconsciouses: a clinical example. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2023.655